RIMS CTAP 2008 Form F Survey

RIMS CTAP is in the process of creating our new three-year plan and we would like your feedback. We have posted our proposed Goals and Objectives that will drive our work for the next three years. Please review the objectives that we have identified for each of the four goal areas. There is a text box at the end of each Program Area for you to submit any comments you may wish to share. Click on the Submit button at the bottom once you have finished your comments. Thank you for your help.

Program Area 1 (of 4): Professional development and learning resources to use technology as a tool to improve teaching and learning.

Objectives Annual Benchmarks	Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data To Be Collected	Frequency of Collection	Program Analysis and Modification Process
Objective 1 of 3: By June, 2011, CTAP Region staff will provide training to teachers in 75% (50) of our 66 districts, including each of our technologically underserved districts, in order to increase their level of technology integration skills (Standards 9, 16); 80% of the surveyed participants will indicate increased skill or proficiency as a result of the training.	EdTechProfile self-assessment of technology use, Sign-in sheets, and CTAP10 Online Evaluation Form. All CTAP 10 participants in multiple day programs will be placed in EdTechProfile groups. ESS will conduct an Annual Survey of CTAP 10 clients to determine importance, access, and impact of all services related to program area 1 as part of an end of the year survey, to cover all areas not assessed with EdTechProfile or workshop evaluations.	Ongoing for participant evaluations Semi-annually for OMS, surveys and EdTechProfile Reports All CTAP 10 participants in multiple day programs will complete EdTehProfile upon completion of program Completion of CTAP 10 Online Evaluation Form and Sign-in Sheets at each session CTAP Annual Survey completed by June 15th each year.	ESS to collect, disaggregate and analyze data from CTAP 10 Evaluation Forms EdTechProfile groups will be established to allow analysis of participant change over time Analyze and attempt to rectify any problems related to lack of participation from rural and/or technologically underserved districts in the CTAP 10 region. Data will be reviewed semi-annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still meet client needs. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: By June 2009, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training to teachers in 50% (33) of our 66 districts, including 9 of our 18 technologically underserved districts, in order to increase their effectiveness in integrating technology into teaching and learning; 80% of the surveyed participants will indicate increased skill or proficiency as a result of the training.
End of year 2: By June 2010, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training to teachers in 60% (40) of our 66 districts, including 11 of our 18 technologically underserved districts, in order to increase their effectiveness in integrating technology into teaching and learning; 80% of the surveyed participants will indicate increased skill or proficiency as a result of the training.
End of year 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training to teachers in 75%(50) of our 66 districts, including 14 of our 18 technologically underserved districts, in order to increase their effectiveness in integrating technology into teaching and learning; 80% of the surveyed participants will indicate increased skill or proficiency as a result of the training.
Objective 2 of 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training to teacher leaders in 60% (40) of our 66 districts, including each of our technologically underserved districts, in order to increase district capacity to provide training in integration of technology into teaching and learning; 80% of the surveyed districts will indicate increased training capacity as a result of the training.	OMS Online Registration Reports Follow-up surveys EDTECHPROFILE self-assessment of technology use Sign-in sheets, and CTAP 10 Online Evaluation Form. Review of Teacher Training logs ESS will conduct a CTAP Annual Survey to determine importance, access, and impact of all services related to program area 1 as part of an end of the year survey, to cover all areas not assessed with EdTechProfile or workshop evaluations.	Ongoing for participant evaluations Semi-annually for OMS, surveys and EdTechProfile Reports CTAP Comprehensive Annual Survey completed by June 15th each year.	ESS to collect, disaggregate and analyze data from CTAP 10 Evaluation Forms: EdTechProfile groups will be established to allow analysis of participant change over time Analyze logs for reflections of teachers’ change in practice. Analyze client reactions to sessions for client relevance and quality of service. Analyze and attempt to rectify any problems related to lack of participation from rural and/or technologically underserved districts in the CTAP 10 region. Changes in proficiency level will be analyzed and reported to the project management and other stakeholders as appropriate with recommendations. Data will be reviewed semi-annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still meet client needs. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: By June 2009, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training to teacher leaders in 20% (13) of our 66 districts, including 5 of our 14 technologically underserved districts, in order to increase district capacity to provide training in integration of technology into teaching and learning; 80% of the surveyed districts will indicate increased training capacity as a result of the training.
End of year 2: By June 2010, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training to teacher leaders in 40% (26) of our 66 districts, including 10 of our 14 technologically underserved districts, in order to increase district capacity to provide training in integration of technology into teaching and learning; 80% of the surveyed districts will indicate increased training capacity as a result of the training.
End of year 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training to teacher leaders in 60% (40) of our 66 districts, including 14 of our 14 technologically underserved districts, in order to increase district capacity to provide training in integration of technology into teaching and learning; 80% of the surveyed districts will indicate increased training capacity as a result of the training.
Objective 3 of 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training to teachers in 75% (50) of our 66 districts, including each of our technologically underserved districts, in order increase participants’ ability to access and use electronic learning resources to support teaching and learning and the use of adopted materials; 80% of the surveyed districts will indicate increased ability to access and use electronic learning resources.	Participant Evaluations Follow-up surveys EdTechProfiles Reports Completion of CTAP 10 OMS Online Evaluation Form and Sign-in Sheets of each session. ESS will conduct a Comprehensive CTAP Annual Survey of CTAP 10 clients to determine importance, access, and impact of all services related to program area 1 as part of an end of the year survey, to cover all areas not assessed with workshop evaluations.	Ongoing for participant evaluations Semi-annually for OMS, surveys and EdTechProfile Reports CTAP Comprehensive Annual Survey completed by June 15th each year.	ESS to collect, disaggregate and analyze data from CTAP 10 Evaluation Forms: Analyze and attempt to rectify any problems related to lack of participation from rural and/or technologically underserved districts in the CTAP 10 region. Data will be reviewed semi-annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still meet client needs. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: By June 2009, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training to teachers in 25% (17) of our 66 districts, including 5 of our 14 technologically underserved districts, in order increase participants’ ability to access and use electronic learning resources to support teaching and learning and the use of adopted materials; 80% of the surveyed districts will indicate increased ability to access and use electronic learning resources.
End of year 2: By June 2010, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training to teachers in 50% (33) of our 66 districts, including 10 of our 14 technologically underserved districts, in order increase participants’ ability to access and use electronic learning resources to support teaching and learning and the use of adopted materials; 80% of the surveyed districts will indicate increased ability to access and use electronic learning resources.
End of year 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training to teachers in 75% (50) of our 66 districts, including 14 of our 14 technologically underserved districts, in order increase participants’ ability to access and use electronic learning resources to support teaching and learning and the use of adopted materials; 80% of the surveyed districts will indicate increased ability to access and use electronic learning resources.

Feedback on Program Area 1:

Program Area 2 (of 4): Professional development and support for hardware and telecommunications infrastructure design, implementation, and sustainability

Objectives Annual Benchmarks	Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data To Be Collected	Frequency of Collection	Program Analysis and Modification Process
Objective 1 of 2: By June 2011, 65 of the 70 districts and county offices of education (93%) in Region 10 will have a current state-approved technology plan that meets SBE guidelines	Listing of state-approved technology plans Record of contacts of CTAP staff providing assistance to districts in writing and/or reviewing their technology plans (OMS)	Annually Semi-annually	CTAP staff will analyze the list of expiring district technology plans each year and ensure that districts are contacted with revision information. After each submission cycle, remaining districts will be contacted to provide assistance. Analyze and attempt to rectify any problems related to lack of participation from rural or other technologically underserved districts/counties in the CTAP 10 region as well as other districts without approved tech plans. Data will be reviewed semi-annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still meet client needs. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: By June 2009, 60 of the 70 districts and county offices of education (75%)in Region 10 will have a current state-approved technology plan that meets SBE guidelines
End of year 2: By June 2010, 63 of the 70 districts and county offices of education (83%) in Region 10 will have a current state-approved technology plan that meets SBE guidelines
End of year 3: By June 2011, 65 of the 70 districts and county offices of education (93%) in Region 10 will have a current state-approved technology plan that meets SBE guidelines
Objective 2 of 2: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will collaborate with TechSETS and the California K-12 High Speed Network (K12 HSN) to assist 70 of the 70 (100%) districts and county offices of education in gaining awareness of TechSETS resources, and how to connect to and identify uses and applications of the HSN.	Survey of school districts’ use of TechSETS and HSN and their access to content Record of attendance/agendas for participants to determine districts receiving training and information. ESS will conduct a Comprehensive CTAP Annual Survey of CTAP 10 clients to determine importance, access, and impact of all services related to program area 2 as part of an end of the year survey, to cover all areas not assessed with workshop evaluations.	Ongoing Annual CTAP Comprehensive Annual Survey completed by June 15th each year.	Data will be reviewed semi-annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still meet client needs. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: By June 2009, CTAP Region 10 will collaborate with TechSETS and the California K-12 High Speed Network (HSN) to assist 35 of the 70 (50%) districts and county offices of education in gaining awareness of TechSETS resources, and how to connect to and identify uses and applications of the HSN.
End of year 2: By June 2010, CTAP Region 10 will collaborate with TechSETS and the California K-12 High Speed Network (HSN) to assist 52 of the 70 (75%) districts and county offices of education in gaining awareness of TechSETS resources, and how to connect to and identify uses and applications of the HSN.
End of year 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will collaborate with TechSETS and the California K-12 High Speed Network (HSN) to assist 70 of the 70 (100%) districts and county offices of education in gaining awareness of TechSETS resources, and how to connect to and identify uses and applications of the HSN.

Feedback on Program Area 2:

Program Area 3 (of 4): Professional development and support related to using technology as a tool to improve school management, including pupil record keeping and tracking related to pupil instruction and data driven decision making

Objectives Annual Benchmarks	Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data To Be Collected	Frequency of Collection	Program Analysis and Modification Process
Objective 1 of 4: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training and assistance to access, analyze and apply academic data to inform instruction to 60% of 66 districts in the region. Program Improvement (PI) schools/districts will receive priority. Region 10 will partner with TICAL and CLRN in using appropriate technology tools –Electronic Learning Assessment Resources (ELARs)	OMS Online Registration Reports Participant Evaluations Reg. 10 data from TICAL annual evaluation. ESS will conduct an Annual Survey to determine importance, access, and impact of all services related to program area 3	Annual CTAP Annual Survey completed by June 15th each year.	ESS will collect and disaggregate data from TICAL annual evaluation Data will be reviewed annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still meet client needs. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: By June 2009, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training and assistance in using appropriate technology tools to access, analyze and apply academic data to inform instruction to 30% of 66 districts in the region. Program Improvement (PI) schools/districts will receive priority.
End of year 2: By June 2010, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training and assistance in using appropriate technology tools to access, analyze and apply academic data to inform instruction to 45% of 66 districts in the region. Program Improvement (PI) schools/districts will receive priority.
End of year 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 staff will provide training and assistance in using appropriate technology tools to access, analyze and apply academic data to inform instruction to 60% of 66 districts in the region. Program Improvement (PI) schools/districts will receive priority.
Objective 2 of 4: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will assist 100% of the 66 school districts and 4 county offices of education with the initial implementation of CALPADS.	CSIS Student Identifier Reports School/District Technology Survey Results OMS Online Registration Reports CALPADS Implementation Reports	Annual	Data will be reviewed annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still meet client needs. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: By June 2009, CTAP Region 10 staff will assist CSIS to ensure that 100% of the 66 school districts and 4 county offices of education have a plan for maintaining student identifier numbers.
End of year 2: By June 2010, CTAP Region 10 staff will assist the CDE to ensure that 100% of the 66 school districts and 4 county offices of education have a working knowledge of the CALPADS system.
End of year 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will assist 100% of the 66 school districts and 4 county offices of education with the initial implementation of CALPADS.
Objective 3 of 4: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will fully implement the Organization Management System (OMS) to fully (100%) align with the annual CTAP Reports and share the system with at least 12 other counties.	Annual feedback from CTAP Region 10 outside evaluator Annual Contracts with counties for the use of the OMS	Annual	Data will be reviewed annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still serve the needs of our clients. Modifications of the program or the benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RIMS CISC RGC for CTAP and the staff at the CDE.
End of year 1: N/A
End of year 2: By June 2010, CTAP Region 10 staff will continue to implement the Organization Management System (OMS) to align with the annual CTAP Reports and share the system with at least 7 other counties.
End of year 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will fully implement the Organization Management System (OMS) to fully (100%) align with the annual CTAP Reports and share the system with at least 12 other counties.
Objective 4 of 4: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will work with True North Logic to develop features that enhance the usability of data reporting in the EdTechProfile system three times.	Annual evaluation of EdTechProfile Technology Survey Tracking the use/access of the School Technology Status Report (STSR)	Annual	Data will be reviewed semi-annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still meet client needs. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: By June 2009, CTAP Region 10 will work with True North Logic to develop features that enhance the usability of data reporting in the EdTechProfile system twice.
End of year 2: By June 2010, CTAP Region 10 will work with True North Logic to develop features that enhance the usability of data reporting in the EdTechProfile system twice.
End of year 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will work with True North Logic to develop features that enhance the usability of data reporting in the EdTechProfile system three times.

Feedback on Program Area 3:

Program Area 4 (of 4): Funding and coordination with other federal, state, and local programs

Objectives Annual Benchmarks	Evaluation Instrument(s) & Data To Be Collected	Frequency of Collection	Program Analysis and Modification Process
Objective 1 of 4: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will provide information and assistance to 70 of 70 (100%) districts and county offices of education in Region 10 who are eligible to receive state, federal, or private funding to support the implementation of districts’ instructional technology plans to enhance student achievement.	Record of district contacts and meetings (OMS) Informational workshop schedules and sign-in sheets News item records	Semi-annual Ongoing	Data will be reviewed semi-annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still meet client needs. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: By June 2009, CTAP Region 10 will provide information and assistance to 56 of 70 (80%) districts and county offices of education in Region 10 who are eligible to receive state, federal, or private funding to support the implementation of districts’ instructional technology plans to enhance student achievement.
End of year 2: By June 2010, CTAP Region 10 will provide information and assistance to 63 of 70 (90%) districts and county offices of education in Region 10 who are eligible to receive state, federal, or private funding to support the implementation of districts’ instructional technology plans to enhance student achievement.
End of year 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will provide information and assistance to 70 of 70 (100%) districts and county offices of education in Region 10 who are eligible to receive state, federal, or private funding to support the implementation of districts’ instructional technology plans to enhance student achievement.
Objective 2 of 4: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will form long-term partnerships with six (6) districts for the purpose of implementing programs developed and/or funded through applications for state, federal or private funding.	Partnership agreements Signed contracts with districts for ongoing professional development	Semi-annual	Data will be reviewed semi-annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still meet client needs. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: By June 2009, CTAP Region 10 will form long-term partnerships with four (4) districts for the purpose of implementing programs developed and/or funded through applications for state, federal or private funding.
End of year 2: By June 2010, CTAP Region 10 will form long-term partnerships with five (5) districts for the purpose of implementing programs developed and/or funded through applications for state, federal or private funding.
End of year 3: By June 2011, CTAP Region 10 will form long-term partnerships with six (10) districts for the purpose of implementing programs developed and/or funded through applications for state, federal or private funding.
Objective 3 of 4: By June 2011, RIMS CTAP will collaborate 12 times per year with other state and regional programs (e.g. RSDSS, AVID, BTSA, ACSA, ROP) to assist them in providing workshops, presentations and resources regarding the use of technology as a tool to improve teaching and learning.	Meeting minutes Workshop schedules and sign-in sheets Record of district contacts and meetings (OMS) OMS Online Registration Reports	Annual Ongoing	Collaborations with other state and regional programs will be reviewed annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still serve the needs of our clients. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: By June 2009, RIMS CTAP will collaborate 6 times per year with other state and regional programs (e.g. RSDSS, AVID, BTSA, ACSA, ROP) to assist them in providing workshops, presentations and resources regarding the use of technology as a tool to improve teaching and learning.
End of year 2: By June 2010, RIMS CTAP will collaborate 8 times per year with other state and regional programs (e.g. RSDSS, AVID, BTSA, ACSA, ROP) to assist them in providing workshops, presentations and resources regarding the use of technology as a tool to improve teaching and learning.
End of year 3: By June 2011, RIMS CTAP will collaborate 12 times per year with other state and regional programs (e.g. RSDSS, AVID, BTSA, ACSA, ROP) to assist them in providing workshops, presentations and resources regarding the use of technology as a tool to improve teaching and learning.
Objective 4 of 4: By June 2011, RIMS CTAP will identify and disseminate 12 case studies that document exemplary projects that integrate quality professional development, instructional strategies and curriculum.	Case Studies submitted to the CDE Case Studies posted on the CTAP Region 10 website	Annual Ongoing	Data will be reviewed semi-annually to determine if program objectives and benchmarks are being met, and still meet client needs. Modifications of the program or benchmarks will take place under the direction of the RAC.
End of year 1: N/A
End of year 2: By June 2010, RIMS CTAP will identify and disseminate 6 case studies that document exemplary EETT Competitive projects and school district projects that integrate quality professional development, instructional strategies and curriculum.
End of year 3: By June 2011. RIMS CTAP will identify and disseminate 12 case studies that document exemplary EETT Competitive projects and school district projects that integrate quality professional development, instructional strategies and curriculum.

Feedback on Program Area 4: